Re:San Diego Implemented City-Wide Streetlight Surveillance
by mark212 on Monday April 01, 2019 @05:50PM
(#19548679)
It’s classified the same as other confidential information. There was a senior detective fired because she mishandled the same class of info on a case, so yeah there are serious consequences for breaking these rules. It’s not at all like corporate policies.
Re:San Diego Implemented City-Wide Streetlight Surveillance
by Terr_ on Monday April 01, 2019 @10:46PM
(#19550615)
So... No criminal charges, just fired? How is that markedly different?
The subtext of my post was that virtuously rigorous guidelines with no enforcement mechanism are a paper tiger.
Re:San Diego Implemented City-Wide Streetlight Surveillance
by mark212 on Wednesday April 03, 2019 @09:48PM
(#19568697)
anything short of criminal charges is "no enforcement mechanism"? You do realize that if you're a POST-certified peace officer and terminated for cause (1) you lose your pension and (2) are utterly unemployable by any other law enforcement agency. That means you're in your mid-50s and can't find a job in the field you've worked in for a few decades, and probably can't get hired as a security guard because lack of POST certification means you can't carry a gun on the job.
It's quite a harsh punishment for accessing records inappropriately.
Much like discussions about corporate policies, I find it helps to ask what happens when the handbook isn't followed...
How many years in prison does someone get for unauthorized access or (if an authorized user) abusing their access for improper use?