Re:Laptops to Stay in Bags as TSA Brings New Technology to A...
by seandougall on Sunday March 31, 2019 @02:57PM
(#19537508)
That would require them to know what regulation backs up their request. Which in turn would require such a regulation to exist. TSA has a particularly bad track record on this (to be fair, the regulations did change absurdly rapidly for the first decade or so of their existence), but I’ve even encountered this problem with police officers.
Re:Laptops to Stay in Bags as TSA Brings New Technology to A...
by rhizome on Sunday March 31, 2019 @12:56AM
(#19533961)
Don't say "no," don't be confrontational, don't say anything. They'll be obvious about it if it's not optional.
Re:Laptops to Stay in Bags as TSA Brings New Technology to A...
by dbdjfjrjvebd on Sunday March 31, 2019 @01:09AM
(#19534006)
It should not be the responsibility of individual members of the public not be threatened or assaulted by the authorities! Such rapid escalation from friendly to threatening should be a retraining issue.
Re:Laptops to Stay in Bags as TSA Brings New Technology to A...
by Reelin on Sunday March 31, 2019 @01:34AM
(#19534083)
> They'll be obvious about it if it's not optional.
I don't believe this is required (or even typical) in the US. Law enforcement is generally allowed to make non-mandatory requests and hope that you comply with them. A prime example is needing to explicitly invoke your right to remain silent (https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=127352...). You might also look up videos of people refusing to cooperate with the immigration checkpoints in various states along the Mexican border.
I'd love to see law enforcement trained in using basic, declarative sentences: "Sir, regulation X.Y.Z says you have to take your shoes off. Please step aside, do so, and rejoin the line."