> Why do you think the hospitals do long shifts then? Just for fun?

Because the culture of US medical training was initiated by a coke addict, and it's extremely conservative and slow-moving.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Stewart_Halsted

But medical shifts are like this the world-over.

Why do you believe that?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_resident_work_hours#EU...

That’s exactly what I mean - cf

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2009/nov/05/nhs-confiden...

In the UK they always worked long shifts because it’s safer. They’re trying to stop them, and it’s less safe.

Why do you think the reason the UK has always worked long hours is due to a drug addiction in the US rather than experience in safety?

> Two case studies involving teenagers who died highlighted the failures to consult senior medical staff early on.

It looks like they are not hiring enough senior staff, not handover problems.

> shortening rota hours had led to more shift changes between medical teams and greater chances for mistakes to occur

It may be true, but for some reason they decide to select two cases where the problem was nor handover but lack of senior staff.

Personally I don’t find “everyone is doing this so it must be rational” a very convincing argument. After all, maybe everyone else followed that same weak argument.

But conversely how do you think everyone arrived at an unsafe practice particular to just these doctors who do handovers and no others? And why do you think they’re campaigning themselves to bring them back for safety in the UK?

All of these countries didn't independently discover medicine, and they do speak with each other i.e. they share a culture. Why do they all dress the same, why are so many addressed with a title in front of their names, and why do they all seem to refer to a lot of things in Latin?

We can choose to think that they independently arrived at an ideal state, but that's not reasonable.