Came to the comments to write a similar comment. I've used Stellarium ~10 years ago, and it's been awesome even then.
Seeing v0.19 version feels misleading and discouraging new users to try it out of curiosity.
I don't trust version numbers since dBASEII.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DBase
> Hal Pawluk, who handled marketing for the nascent company, decided to change the name to the more business-like "dBase". Pawluk devised the use of lower case "d" and all-caps "BASE" to create a distinctive name. Pawluk suggested calling the new product version two ("II") to suggest it was less buggy than an initial release. dBASE II was the result and became a standard CP/M application along with WordStar and SuperCalc.[15]
Edit: Whence the downvotes? Itβs a 20 year old program. I know many OS devs have a certain aversion of making the jump to 1.0, but semver is a useful concept, and versioning that looks like semver, but in practice is not, is not the best way to communicate the maturity of your software to potential users.