Re:Garfield phones beach mystery finally solved
by blackflame7000 on Thursday March 28, 2019 @02:28PM
(#19515105)
Knowing what to eat is actually a very advanced function. There are humans that don't even know not to eat paste. Dogs that eat feces. Teenagers that eat TidePods. Plankton is at a severe disadvantage when comparing neurons.
Re:Garfield phones beach mystery finally solved
by magduf on Thursday March 28, 2019 @02:55PM
(#19515341)
>Dogs that eat feces.
Yet another reason why it baffles me that anyone wants one of these things as a pet.
Cats are smart enough not to eat feces, theirs or anyone else's. They're also smart enough to do their best to bury their own feces so they don't stink up your place.
Re:Garfield phones beach mystery finally solved
by freeflight on Thursday March 28, 2019 @04:40PM
(#19516366)
That's just the toxoplasmosis talking [0], the little furry monsters have already made you their servant.
In contrast to cats, these dog "things" can actually be very useful, and extremely loyal [1], working animals.
[0] https://www.sciencealert.com/we-finally-know-how-the-mind-al...
Re:Garfield phones beach mystery finally solved
by jimmaswell on Thursday March 28, 2019 @02:34PM
(#19515157)
It's my understanding that the dog isn't harmed by doing that, and it's just a way to recoup/find missing nutrients.
Re:Garfield phones beach mystery finally solved
by nothrabannosir on Thursday March 28, 2019 @12:36PM
(#19513852)
This point stands without the snark. I understand the frustration when people poopooh climate issues, but at the end of the day, nobody is served by a slapfest.
Would you please consider editing to remove the snarky jabs?
Re:Garfield phones beach mystery finally solved
by scrollaway on Thursday March 28, 2019 @12:41PM
(#19513913)
I'm not reading snark in the parent's response. Consider giving people the benefit of the doubt.
Re:Garfield phones beach mystery finally solved
by smogcutter on Thursday March 28, 2019 @01:57PM
(#19514789)
> Perhaps you need an analogy
> Here is a video in case you are unable to follow:
This is patronizing and rude.
Re:Garfield phones beach mystery finally solved
by magduf on Thursday March 28, 2019 @02:58PM
(#19515368)
Possibly, but in cases where someone is being willfully obtuse (which I'm not claiming is the case here, but I see it elsewhere a lot), how else are you supposed to respond? Constantly being polite when someone is being willfully contrary actually seems to result in the other person appearing to win the argument according to bystanders. We see this in politics all the time: the candidates who sling mud and make bad arguments and cite outright falsehoods win elections, while the ones who always take the high road lose.
Perhaps you need an analogy:
Consider if a company were to sell you a plastic hamburgers disguised as a real hamburgers (i.e. how advertising food products used to be before being outlawed). Now, pretend you could swallow and ingest a hamburger whole (without chewing i.e. how plankton eat). What do you think will happen to your body?
Here is a video in case you are unable to follow: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=beUhzQAkanM