Re:Cisco Fixes RV320/RV325 Vulnerability by Banning “curl” i...
by SkyBelow on Thursday March 28, 2019 @09:50AM
(#19512138)
Let me know when pride is accepted as currency to pay bills or when insubordination due to personal pride is seen as a desirable quality in a candidate. At the very least, how much are you willing to pay a person for not implementing the fix you disagree with (including engaging in a legal contract to pay them if they lose their employment due to not implementing the fix). From my past experiences with others, moral high grounds rarely survive personal stake.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Cisco Fixes RV320/RV325 Vulnerability by Banning “curl” i...
by konstmonst on Thursday March 28, 2019 @11:10AM
(#19512926)
Pleas tell me in what country is it an issue for a software developer to make money?
I mean in this situation, if I were forced to implement such fix, I would do it, but would then quit the next month. Because if I were to stay, not only would I get worse professionally, but I would feel dirty for not doing my work properly. The companies that accept such fixes are more often than not like a factory and treat you as gear in a machine. And also have an ugly software which make good engineers quit.
Re:Cisco Fixes RV320/RV325 Vulnerability by Banning “curl” i...
by SkyBelow on Thursday March 28, 2019 @05:17PM
(#19516728)
USA. Not everyone has the economic mobility to just quit at any time. I know one such individual who I have been encouraging to get a new job because his current employment leaves him working a second job on weekends.
One could suggest to such people to display enough financial discipline to save up a rainy day fund, but this is ignoring all the procedures in place designed specifically for depressing wages.