Re:Cisco Fixes RV320/RV325 Vulnerability by Banning “curl” i...
by spaceribs on Thursday March 28, 2019 @09:02AM
(#19511746)
I've come to the conclusion recently that we're all just barbers, bloodletting and burring holes. Until we have proper certifiable and reproducible competency, we'll never become surgeons.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Cisco Fixes RV320/RV325 Vulnerability by Banning “curl” i...
by PaulHoule on Thursday March 28, 2019 @10:35AM
(#19512564)
Don't you need a license to be a barber?
Re:Cisco Fixes RV320/RV325 Vulnerability by Banning “curl” i...
by spaceribs on Thursday March 28, 2019 @01:10PM
(#19514246)
In modern times yes, here's some interesting reading on the guilds licensing originated from - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worshipful_Company_of_Barbers
Re:Cisco Fixes RV320/RV325 Vulnerability by Banning “curl” i...
by flatline on Thursday March 28, 2019 @10:26AM
(#19512489)
And yet the US has consistently been in the vanguard of software development worldwide. Do we need surgeons? Do you need a four year postgraduate degree and three more years of apprenticeship before slinging together a web app? Certainly the industry has its problems, and some applications demand more rigor, but I don’t see this as much of a general solution.
Re:Cisco Fixes RV320/RV325 Vulnerability by Banning “curl” i...
by spaceribs on Thursday March 28, 2019 @11:00AM
(#19512825)
The market didn't demand a high survival rate or efficacy for barbering either, but do you think that the (conscious or unconscious) that software engineers are some sort of magical wizards will last forever?
Re:Cisco Fixes RV320/RV325 Vulnerability by Banning “curl” i...
by mandelbrotwurst on Thursday March 28, 2019 @08:27PM
(#19518027)
There may be explanations beyond wizardry - e.g. maybe barbers were historically often self-employed, small business owners who realized they stood to gain from creating barriers to entry such as licensing requirements.