News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Cisco Fixes RV320/RV325 Vulnerability by Banning “curl” i... by pdpi on Thursday March 28, 2019 @08:55AM (#19511686)
If you're a company the size of Cisco, and you have two widely publicised vulnerabilities like this, then this sort of failure is _always_ management's responsibility.

That responsibility might come in the form of "big bad management" chasing the cheapest possible "fix" against the advice of the the hero engineers, but it can take other shapes too. It might be poor oversight and QA processes, or a failure to hire and/or assign competent engineers for the task.

Re:Cisco Fixes RV320/RV325 Vulnerability by Banning “curl” i... by admax88q on Thursday March 28, 2019 @12:46PM (#19513964)
> That responsibility might come in the form of "big bad management" chasing the cheapest possible "fix" against the advice of the the hero engineers

This is the narrative that always shows up in HN. Big bad management vs the hero engineer. It makes us feel good about ourselves while also absolving us of all responsibility. Its a bullshit narrative.