News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on F-35: What The Pilots Say. Parent comment

Re:F-35: What The Pilots Say by varjag on Thursday March 28, 2019 @08:46AM (#19511616)
It's good we on HN, unlike military pilots, have no bias and can focus on things that matter in warplane mission performance.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:F-35: What The Pilots Say by pkilgore on Thursday March 28, 2019 @08:59AM (#19511720)
Can't wait to find the forum of fighter pilots bitching about Rust vs. C.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:F-35: What The Pilots Say by thekingofh on Thursday March 28, 2019 @09:28AM (#19511949)
Clearly they would choose raw x86_64 assembly for its superior performance profile.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:F-35: What The Pilots Say by rbanffy on Thursday March 28, 2019 @10:58AM (#19512788)
x86-64 is very non-deterministic - way too many issues can impact individual thread performance. Better go with a barrel processor design.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:F-35: What The Pilots Say by varjag on Thursday March 28, 2019 @11:25AM (#19513110)
Have you heard of Spectre?! The whole architecture is crap and should be scrapped in favor of Acorn RISC.
[ Parent | on HN ]