Re:Cisco Fixes RV320/RV325 Vulnerability by Banning “curl” i...
by lewisj489 on Thursday March 28, 2019 @08:07AM
(#19511348)
You're writing your websites wrong.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Cisco Fixes RV320/RV325 Vulnerability by Banning “curl” i...
by fixermark on Thursday March 28, 2019 @09:20AM
(#19511874)
I've had to debug around a short-lived bug in the Firefox rendering engine that only showed up in the FF rendering engine before. The site itself? Standards-compliant; there was flexibility in the standard (ironically, for flexboxes ;) ) about performance constraints and our site just fell down Gecko's slowness tree and hit every branch on the way.
Given the engines are allowed to vary, this experience is inevitable from time to time. The user-agent is really valuable in helping us figure out when that's what we're seeing.
Re:Cisco Fixes RV320/RV325 Vulnerability by Banning “curl” i...
by baggy_trough on Thursday March 28, 2019 @10:13AM
(#19512358)
If there’s a way to write them without the occasional browser-specific bug, I’d sure like to know what it is.