News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Microsoft says encryption laws make companies wary of sto... by marcus_holmes on Wednesday March 27, 2019 @11:17PM (#19508897)
I've had long discussions with techie friends about this, and none of us can see a way that the government could actually force a dev to do anything in a way that doesn't immediately tip off the rest of the team.

I mean, your code is stored in a shared repo, right? So pushing a commit with the government-mandated changes to the shared repo is "informing others". But not pushing it means it'll never get to Prod.

Most places review code commits routinely, so how is a dev supposed to get their government-mandated changes into Prod without anyone seeing them?

If your Australian co-worker stops pushing their commits to the repo and starts trying to make changes to Prod without going through review, it's also a strong signal that something might be going on here...

In fact, if this legislation posed any kind of threat to your business, then your software development processes are broken and you're vulnerable to a ton of other, more likely, threats.

The legislation was written by a shower of technically-incompetent career politicians, with absolutely zero understanding of (or interest in) how software development works. This is the same mob of idiots of pronounced "the laws of mathematics are all very well, but we're in Australia so we obey Australian laws" when discussing their plans to break cryptography.

It's unenforceable, ridiculous, and will get changed before it ever gets used.

But as a startup tech co-founder dealing with encrypted documents, and an Australian citizen, I'm not planning to launch in Australia until it's fixed, and leaving Australia until it's fixed.

Re:Microsoft says encryption laws make companies wary of sto... by fgnjksadklafs on Thursday March 28, 2019 @03:14AM (#19509989)
Really? It took me about 10 seconds to come up with this: "Hey tech dude, we need a version of iOS that unlocks the encryption on this device. Be a good boy and send us an IPSW that we can install on this nasty person's phone will you?"

You don't need to release it to the public. Build it on your local device and hand it to them. Nobody needs to know.

Re:Microsoft says encryption laws make companies wary of sto... by lozenge on Thursday March 28, 2019 @06:06AM (#19510745)
The number of people with access to the private keys that sign iOS updates must be very limited - I wouldn't be surprised if you needed at least two people actively involved in signing every update.

On top of that, Apple is heavily siloed, and somebody working on the Calendar app won't have information on the operation of Secure Enclave, the chip that deals with authenticating fingerprints, passcodes, Apple Pay etc.

So it would be more like "Hey tech dude, can you sneak a change to the compiler your company uses to build iOS, to have it compile a backdoor into iOS, then surreptitiously login to the relevant machines and place your new compiler?"

Re:Microsoft says encryption laws make companies wary of sto... by marcus_holmes on Thursday March 28, 2019 @07:14AM (#19511031)
If a developer in Apple has access to the signing keys for iOS and can decrypt anything at all on a production device, then Apple is totally screwed.

It simply cannot work like this, because a single rogue employee can (and would have by now) posted it on a forum/wikileaks/something, simply because they could.