Re:Cisco Fixes RV320/RV325 Vulnerability by Banning “curl” i...
by shhehebehdh on Thursday March 28, 2019 @12:41AM
(#19509321)
Does it really provide that much entropy? Maybe back in the days when browsers didn’t auto-update, but intuitively it should only provide about four bits at most (os: Android iOS macOS windows, browser: chrome safari edge ie ff) except for a few rare users who don’t stay up to date or choose a weird browser (and those folks probably are a little confused about how privacy works).
Re:Cisco Fixes RV320/RV325 Vulnerability by Banning “curl” i...
by woodrowbarlow on Thursday March 28, 2019 @09:59AM
(#19512222)
ohhhhh you betcha.
i ran this on my work laptop (windows 10 / firefox - mostly default settings). the "details" tab shows a full breakdown of each fingerprinting component with a "similarity ratio" (percentage of fingerprints that share the same value).
every entry is 20% or greater, most of them around 50% except for timezone (4%), canvas (1%), and user agent (0.12%).
so, yeah, user agents are still the largest source of entropy by a wide margin for fingerprinting scripts.
Re:Cisco Fixes RV320/RV325 Vulnerability by Banning “curl” i...
by shhehebehdh on Saturday March 30, 2019 @12:36PM
(#19530298)
I suspect this is just stale data. I can’t think why the most recent version of a browser would put me at one in a thousand.
So what. Removing one of the largest sources entropy available for fingerprinting users is important. We shouldn't maintain the terrible long-term effects[1] of tracking everything just to help you have an easier time debugging.
[1] http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/02/shoshana-zuboff-q-and...