Re:Flaws in Bitcoin make a lasting revival unlikely
by martindale on Thursday March 28, 2019 @02:22AM
(#19509731)
As long as you run your own node, it doesn't really matter who runs the rest. If a peer relays an invalid block to you, disconnect from that peer and defer to the chain with the most work.
Have you read the paper?
Re:Flaws in Bitcoin make a lasting revival unlikely
by schmichael on Thursday March 28, 2019 @11:06AM
(#19512884)
If a block is accepted by a majority of nodes and miners it isn't invalid.
Your own personal node is free to implement different logic, but it will be unlikely to interact in a functional way with the rest of the network.
Re:Flaws in Bitcoin make a lasting revival unlikely
by martindale on Friday March 29, 2019 @07:35PM
(#19526510)
The full node operators are typically holding Bitcoin, and I just don't see anyone willingly accepting a reduction in the value of their assets. Any such block would be viewed as an attack on their sovereignty.
It's absolutely possible. Who runs nodes? There's no way to know that the majority of hash power doesn't already control a majority of nodes.