News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:If You Can’t Afford the Rent, It’s My Problem, Too by throwawaysea on Wednesday March 27, 2019 @01:48PM (#19503691)
> Because the "new ones" are the kids of the "existing ones", in many cases, if not most.

Do you have a source for this? Personally I don't buy it.

But just for a second, let's assume that's the case. Would you be OK with limiting rent subsidies to just those who either have provably been residents for multiple years (let's say 5+ years) or have long-time roots (e.g. family)? I don't think any city owes expansion and housing supply and a re-architecture to accommodate just anyone who wants to move there.

Re:If You Can’t Afford the Rent, It’s My Problem, Too by bzbarsky on Thursday March 28, 2019 @12:05AM (#19509143)
> Do you have a source for this?

Non-anecdotal? Not at the moment, sorry. I'd have to go dig. But anecdotally, most of the people I hear complaining about rents (not in SV, various places on the East Coast) are complaining about it being impossible to stay near aging relatives.

> Would you be OK with limiting rent subsidies to just those who either have provably been residents for multiple years (let's say 5+ years) or have long-time roots (e.g. family)?

I personally? It really depends on the form the "rent subsidies" take and how they're financed. I do think that thinking of "build more housing if there's more demand" as a "rent subsidy" is a bit odd, if that's the sort of thing we're talking about here.

> I don't think any city owes expansion and housing supply and a re-architecture to accommodate just anyone who wants to move there.

Now we're talking about the moral and ethical dimension of things, right? Opinions on this differ widely; I personally do not have strong opinions that would apply in a blanket way, and would prefer to analyze specific cases (i.e. specific cities) on a case-by-case basis.