And apparently, little incentive to improve their city and environment. What the wealthy need to realize is that human nature is hard wired to notice relative wealth inequality. Crime and social unrest are directly related to perceptions of relative wealth inequality. Past a certain point, life expectancy is directly correlated with relative wealth inequality, not absolute wealth. [b]
http://www.sfindicatorproject.org/indicators/view/146
https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/02/15/income-inequality-in-...
([b] Ichiro Kawachi, 2000. Income Inequality and Health. In Social Epidemiology. Eds. Lisa Berkman and Ichiro Kawachi. New York: Oxford University Press. Pp. 76-94.)
Nobody is saying they should put all the money into turning a developing country in the USA, but maybe they can, I don't know, try other cities around the valley and not get crammed all together into one city that's naturally restricted in growth
https://www.kpbs.org/news/2019/jan/03/more-half-san-diego-co...
Sure enough, other cities are up and coming, but it takes time.
https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/business/real-estate/sd...
Is it though? I feel SF is a rathole that is occupied by a lot of people who overpay for rent because their salary allows them to.
If you're really wealthy, you're not going to be living in the city at all.
???
Huh?
Are you talking about the same San Francisco as everyone else here?
The rich live in San Francisco, the wealthy live in Napa Valley / Sonoma County. Can't fit a helipad, two tennis courts, putting green, and an olympic size swimming pool downtown.
The wealthy have their own very large islands. Islands that are very likely nature preserves. They don't need Napa Valley. I can assure you though, that the wealthy also have homes all over the world. And I guarantee you that crappy cities that smell like pee, such as London, San Fran, and Paris, are on their holdings list.
That's just the way it is, cool kids want to hang out with cool kids. And when they're not, they want their privacy.
VCs are largely already wealthy, and SF is a pleasant city to live in if you're already wealthy. As such, they have little incentive to move, and so founders will continue to flock there to start their companies.
I completely agree that shopping around for cities should be easier, so that city governments like SF are forced to get their head out of their ass and make their city competitive.
However, until SF becomes unpleasant to live in for rich people, not much is going to change.