Re:Get Satisfaction responds to NYTimes' DecorMyEyes Article
by Natsu on Monday November 29, 2010 @02:31AM
(#1949694)
Why would they need to put nofollow on links to their own site?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Get Satisfaction responds to NYTimes' DecorMyEyes Article
by getsat on Monday November 29, 2010 @02:44AM
(#1949718)
He's referring to this: http://i.imgur.com/KqMcq.png
From here: http://getsatisfaction.com/decormyeyescom
Despite what the blog entry says, they ARE contributing to the problem.
Re:Get Satisfaction responds to NYTimes' DecorMyEyes Article
by Natsu on Monday November 29, 2010 @02:53PM
(#1951547)
I see, so they missed a few links. It appears to have been fixed now, though, because I can no longer find that HTML on the page.
I wonder if Google will ever be smart enough to take ranking highly for searches like "scam" or "fraud" into account (without penalizing the people exposing scams and frauds) when computing someone's pagerank?
Re:Get Satisfaction responds to NYTimes' DecorMyEyes Article
by getsat on Thursday December 02, 2010 @02:37PM
(#1963380)
Your wish is their command: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/12/being-bad-to-your-cus...