News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Get Satisfaction responds to NYTimes' DecorMyEyes Article. Parent comment

Re:Get Satisfaction responds to NYTimes' DecorMyEyes Article by ajays on Monday November 29, 2010 @01:27AM (#1949581)
I just looked at their page, and both the "contact us" and "home" links don't have "nofollow" in them.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Get Satisfaction responds to NYTimes' DecorMyEyes Article by Natsu on Monday November 29, 2010 @02:31AM (#1949694)
Why would they need to put nofollow on links to their own site?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Get Satisfaction responds to NYTimes' DecorMyEyes Article by getsat on Monday November 29, 2010 @02:44AM (#1949718)
He's referring to this: http://i.imgur.com/KqMcq.png

From here: http://getsatisfaction.com/decormyeyescom

Despite what the blog entry says, they ARE contributing to the problem.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Get Satisfaction responds to NYTimes' DecorMyEyes Article by Natsu on Monday November 29, 2010 @02:53PM (#1951547)
I see, so they missed a few links. It appears to have been fixed now, though, because I can no longer find that HTML on the page.

I wonder if Google will ever be smart enough to take ranking highly for searches like "scam" or "fraud" into account (without penalizing the people exposing scams and frauds) when computing someone's pagerank?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Get Satisfaction responds to NYTimes' DecorMyEyes Article by getsat on Thursday December 02, 2010 @02:37PM (#1963380)
Your wish is their command: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/12/being-bad-to-your-cus...
[ Parent | on HN ]