News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Homeless, living in a tent and employed: The changing fac... by syshum on Saturday March 23, 2019 @02:43PM (#19471737)
It is not a matter of "refusing shelter" it is a matter of refusing the strings that come with the Shelter.

Like the story says most shelters have a litany of rules that most reasonable people would find objectionable. Some even require you to attend religious services, or preform some other act.

Then you have the one that refuse pets (homeless people will not and should not have to give up their pets)

then you have a Single Sex only shelters where couples would be split

Then you have the fact that in many cities there is an extreme lack of Men's shelters as most of the funding goes to Women and Children shelters.

I could probably list a dozen or more other facts more than "the damn homeless just refuse help"

Re:Homeless, living in a tent and employed: The changing fac... by XaoDaoCaoCao on Saturday March 23, 2019 @11:04PM (#19473940)
My review of a Salvation Army shelter I stayed in https://goo.gl/maps/TpjnpVLgQPp

There are good programs but man, it's become fucking business.

Re:Homeless, living in a tent and employed: The changing fac... by twblalock on Saturday March 23, 2019 @02:46PM (#19471749)
> I could probably list a dozen or more other facts more than "the damn homeless just refuse help"

I never said that. It is an unfair misrepresentation of my argument.

Re:Homeless, living in a tent and employed: The changing fac... by syshum on Saturday March 23, 2019 @02:49PM (#19471765)
Apologizes if that is not what you meant, I have been following this issue for many years and I have encountered a large number of people that shift the blame on to homeless themselves because they believe the current programs that are out there should be more than enough to solve the problem is the homeless would just "accept the help"
Re:Homeless, living in a tent and employed: The changing fac... by debatem1 on Saturday March 23, 2019 @02:56PM (#19471793)
Text is an imperfect medium etc, but for what it's worth this is what I read in your statement above as well.