We are talking about software developers. In the 1950s, most programmers were female. It doesn't seem to be a profession where male biological characteristics are essential to be successful. All the examples you mentioned are non-essential for being a good software developer.
We were talking about the existence of gender based 90/10 skews.
As to femle programmers in the 1950’s, do you really think that is comparable?
Yes, in the context of a program to educate women specifically about how to code.
Comparable to what? I mentioned programming in the 1950s because all traits labeled in this discussion as "boys/males biologically have more of it than girls/women" have been as important for programming in the 1950s as they are now, it seems to me
So you think the women that worked as “computers” in the fifties entered the field because they had a passion for electronic machines?
These women were much more into 'things' than 'people'.
It would be your turn now to explain which biological characteristics of men cause a 90/10 distribution in coders today, and do not apply to coding in the 1950s.
But it’s not all bad, men have 20 times more testosterone, which makes them stronger and faster. So clearly there are lots of biological differences with a 90/10 distribution.