News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How the car industry hid the truth about diesel emissions by jokoon on Saturday March 23, 2019 @05:35AM (#19469771)
no mask can filter particles
Re:How the car industry hid the truth about diesel emissions by blattimwind on Saturday March 23, 2019 @07:35AM (#19470033)
Filtering airborne particulates is pretty much the baseline reason to use masks ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

(However surgical masks aren't meant to do that, they're only meant to catch things expelled from you, not the other way around. So I guess your interjection is somewhat correct in that running around with a surgical mask does pretty much nil to improve the quality of the air you inhale.)

Re:How the car industry hid the truth about diesel emissions by Al-Khwarizmi on Saturday March 23, 2019 @09:10AM (#19470302)
Doctors also have masks to protect them from external things (for example, when they deal with patients that have tuberculosis), although I've just learned from Google that they are not technically called masks, but respirators (N95 respirators).

They are quite uncomfortable to wear, though. You can breathe just fine for extended period of time but it feels (at least to me, a layman in these things) like you get less air. I wouldn't wear it as an everyday thing.

I have no idea if there are more comfortable solutions that can handle pollution.

Re:How the car industry hid the truth about diesel emissions by blattimwind on Saturday March 23, 2019 @11:19AM (#19470801)
I'm a hobbyist woodworker and so I wear a half-mask with either a simple flat P3R filter [1] or a bigger A2P3R filter stack [2] a lot when doing that. When it's hot it is a bit annoying that sweat and moisture tends to condense in the mask. Another annoying thing is that these kind of masks tend to put pressure on the nasal bridge which gives you similar issues like a poorly adjusted pair of glasses. This is a larger problem with the filter stack because it is much heavier than the flat filters.

As for efficiency, I found a paper (DGUV IFA 0233) saying standard P3 particle filters are highly efficient even against ultrafine aerosol particles (particle diameter below 100 nm); for "larger" stuff (PM1 and larger) these are specified to remove more than 99.9 % of them.

This actually leads to P3 filters already removing a lot of smells, e.g. when you machine steel or wood, sand wood or grind steel, you don't smell it. However, gaseous stuff like solvents get through. That's what the A2 filter is for.

[1] https://asset.conrad.com/media10/isa/160267/c1/-/de/831230_A...

[2] https://assets.tooler.de/cimage/700x700/media/catalog/produc... [note: outer particle filter isn't installed in this picture, it would go under the translucent hood and is about the size of a Leibniz keks [3]

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leibniz-Keks

Re:How the car industry hid the truth about diesel emissions by projektfu on Saturday March 23, 2019 @09:31AM (#19470368)
I've worked in one and I got used to it, wearing it for an hour at a time for 4-5 hours per day. For comfort, a positive pressure air purifying respirator (PAPR) is preferable but looks like you're on a biohazard scene.
Re:How the car industry hid the truth about diesel emissions by jokoon on Saturday March 23, 2019 @03:18PM (#19471897)
Do you have any link or description of such a mask?