News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Longevity and anti-aging research: ‘Prime time for an imp... by SCHiM on Tuesday March 19, 2019 @06:02AM (#19429432)
Enter K-level thinking:

What if we did send a ship on a thousand year journey, and learn more about building fast ships than if we hadn't? Such that the second ship we send, would be quicker than the first ship we'd have sent if we waited a few decades?

Re:Longevity and anti-aging research: ‘Prime time for an imp... by shard on Tuesday March 19, 2019 @07:40AM (#19429880)
Do you put off buying electronics knowing that next year's product will be faster than this year's? At some point you just got to say, screw it, I'd rather do this now instead of waiting for some hypothetical future where the cost-benefit ratio is at its highest.
Re:Longevity and anti-aging research: ‘Prime time for an imp... by AstralStorm on Tuesday March 19, 2019 @08:55AM (#19430288)
Additionally, why do you expect the old ship cannot be retrofitted or replaced and travel sped up incrementally?

It should be easy to find a hot broadcasting object in space and rendezvous with it. The crew might face some future shock.

Re:Longevity and anti-aging research: ‘Prime time for an imp... by raugustinus on Tuesday March 19, 2019 @07:11AM (#19429734)
Hah, you made me think of this: "what's really going to bake your noodle later on is would you still have broken it if I wouldn't have said anything".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVF4kebiks4