News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Eliminating Robocalls by noah256 on Monday March 18, 2019 @05:07PM (#19425324)
The point of the article is that the phone numbers that robocalls come from are trivially spoofed. So, it's plausible that these are real people's phones being spoofed, and it would be quite rude to them to publish their phone numbers in a way that could be read as indicating the number is a robot.
Re:Eliminating Robocalls by minikites on Monday March 18, 2019 @05:13PM (#19425374)
So it's preventing the equivalent of dialing random numbers and hoping it's a real person?
Re:Eliminating Robocalls by dgnorton on Monday March 18, 2019 @05:21PM (#19425447)
No. When you get a spam call, the caller ID is often not random. It's usually the number of some other person on the spam caller's list of people to call, often someone from your same area code. That way, you see a call from your area code and are more likely to answer it. If you get upset and call it back, you won't be calling the spammer. You'll be calling some other innocent victim of the spammer.
Re:Eliminating Robocalls by bigtex on Monday March 18, 2019 @06:20PM (#19425952)
Most of the time the caller id shares the same area code and first 3 digits of the recipient's phone number. Many times the last 4 digits are the same just in a different order.
Re:Eliminating Robocalls by sephlietz on Monday March 18, 2019 @05:19PM (#19425425)
No, but it could be preventing the equivalent of "here is a random phone number I picked, please 1000 of you dial it".