Re:Saving of public Google+ content by the Archive Team has ...
by dredmorbius on Monday March 18, 2019 @03:14PM
(#19424167)
I'm definitely of mixed minds on this.
The fact that IA's WBM is a public rather than private archive helps their case, IMO. Though I don't necessarily agree in unlimited rights to mass-record all public data, doing so transparently beats private data brokers.
Google's own messaging on this has been largely abysmal as well. Don't get me started.
Mostly I appreciate hugely what archive.org does, though like the root comment, I'm much less keen on ephemeral social networks preserved. Especially as most users will never see an announcement on a specialised reddit sub or HN, so will never know it wasn't all deleted like Google announced. Yes, I know it's not sensible to rely on no copies, but most naive users probably assume that. :)