News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Saving of public Google+ content by the Archive Team has ... by NeedMoreTea on Sunday March 17, 2019 @06:23PM (#19417117)
OK, that sounds more reasonable. The help page made it sound that unable to remove for not being uploaded by oneself - therefore have no archive ID or account to associate with was the most likely response.

Mostly I appreciate hugely what archive.org does, though like the root comment, I'm much less keen on ephemeral social networks preserved. Especially as most users will never see an announcement on a specialised reddit sub or HN, so will never know it wasn't all deleted like Google announced. Yes, I know it's not sensible to rely on no copies, but most naive users probably assume that. :)

Re:Saving of public Google+ content by the Archive Team has ... by dredmorbius on Monday March 18, 2019 @03:14PM (#19424167)
I'm definitely of mixed minds on this.

The fact that IA's WBM is a public rather than private archive helps their case, IMO. Though I don't necessarily agree in unlimited rights to mass-record all public data, doing so transparently beats private data brokers.

Google's own messaging on this has been largely abysmal as well. Don't get me started.