News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Addressing Spotify’s Claims by felipelemos on Friday March 15, 2019 @05:25AM (#19398008)
And I am free to use Google Music, Apple Music, YouTube Music, Deezer and even Tidal. Nobody is forcing me to use Spotify.

But, if I have an iPhone, the only application store I can use is controlled by Apple.

In other words: if I am an artist and I want to offer my music via streaming I have plenty of options. If one of them does have a deal that I find unfair, I can choose others.

If I am a developer and I want to offer my app to iPhone users, I have only one option. And if I am banned from this store for any policy infringement (which sometimes is ridiculous and totally arbitrary) I have no other option to offer my app to iPhone users.

Re:Addressing Spotify’s Claims by thisacctforreal on Friday March 15, 2019 @06:14AM (#19398258)
I think it's somewhat frequent to have app submissions denied, but I haven't heard of Apple banning future submissions in the same way that I hear of Google permabanning developers.

I agree with Android it's slightly different because side loading is at least possible, but I doubt many people are going to find your widget if it's not on the play store.

Re:Addressing Spotify’s Claims by hjk05 on Friday March 15, 2019 @03:11PM (#19403130)
True, and if I’m a dairy farm that wants to sell my products to Walmart’s customers there’s only one distributor of shelf space to go to. You can’t cut through an arbitrary point in the business and just demand they change their model. The iPhone might not even be a viable platform today if they had been forced to carry malware from the start because they had “a monopoly on their own product”
Re:Addressing Spotify’s Claims by ajharrison on Friday March 15, 2019 @09:37AM (#19399548)
I as a customer don't want your app from outside the App Store, from where I know I can get apps that protect my privacy and information.