News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Telegram gets 3M new signups during Facebook apps’ outage by roel_v on Thursday March 14, 2019 @06:48AM (#19388038)
Having just installed Signal yesterday, in what respect is it worse than Whatsapp (from a UI pov)? The only thing I found so far is the bad integration with contacts.
Re:Telegram gets 3M new signups during Facebook apps’ outage by anotheryou on Thursday March 14, 2019 @08:12AM (#19388478)
I mostly use it on desktop and the clients feels like 10 years ago.

- Doesn't go in to system tray (unless you fiddle with command line arguments).

- can't search messages

- overall unpolished (e.g. saving a file has no "show in folder" option afterwards)

Re:Telegram gets 3M new signups during Facebook apps’ outage by jumbopapa on Thursday March 14, 2019 @08:36AM (#19388635)
I'd also like to mention that you can't use the desktop client standalone and Signal requires a phone number to sign up. It would be nice if they got rid of these requirements.

I use Signal and Telegram both - it's clear to me that Telegram provides the better user experience. I like Signal from the privacy standpoint though.

If you're using Android then I think that Signal is kind of a no-brainer to use because it doubles as your SMS client, so if a contact is a Signal user you get the privacy you want, but if they aren't at least you can still text them.

Re:Telegram gets 3M new signups during Facebook apps’ outage by aepc2 on Thursday March 14, 2019 @04:39PM (#19393443)
Only problem: if a user (A) signs up for signal and then uninstalls, the phone number is still tied to the signal app. This means that a signal user (B) now can't get messages to user A. The messages gets delivered to a dead signal account. User A must manually deactivate her account, which she is not even informed about when deleting. Also: if user A has her number trabsferred too somebody else (which is often the case with e g work phones) her account is now owned by a random person.
Re:Telegram gets 3M new signups during Facebook apps’ outage by FredFS456 on Thursday March 14, 2019 @10:13AM (#19389348)
Whatsapp doesn't operate as a standalone client either.
Re:Telegram gets 3M new signups during Facebook apps’ outage by newscracker on Thursday March 14, 2019 @10:27AM (#19389511)
The parent talked about signing up for Signal requiring a phone number. The following point is tangential from that after the signup is completed using a phone number. Signal Desktop is a standalone client that can be launched and used without having one's phone nearby or available or connected to the net. WhatsApp, however, requires the phone to be around and connected for the desktop app to send the chats through. From that perspective, WhatsApp actually offers a worse user experience than Signal.
Re:Telegram gets 3M new signups during Facebook apps’ outage by jumbopapa on Thursday March 14, 2019 @10:17AM (#19389398)
I never said it did, but I don't use Facebook properties to begin with.
Re:Telegram gets 3M new signups during Facebook apps’ outage by newscracker on Thursday March 14, 2019 @10:23AM (#19389457)
> - Doesn't go in to system tray (unless you fiddle with command line arguments).

This was really jarring for me the first time I used Signal Desktop on Windows. I clicked on the close button and then realized that the app had terminated instead of minimizing to the tray (as such apps would be expected by many users to behave).

Thanks, I didn't know about command line arguments for that. I'll check it out.

Re:Telegram gets 3M new signups during Facebook apps’ outage by anotheryou on Thursday March 14, 2019 @01:09PM (#19391215)
Put a link to the exe somewhere (e.g. the start-up folder in the start menu).

Than edit the target to add the argument:

C:\Users\[your_username]\AppData\Local\Programs\signal-desktop\Signal.exe --start-in-tray

Re:Telegram gets 3M new signups during Facebook apps’ outage by kitsunesoba on Thursday March 14, 2019 @11:36AM (#19390181)
Signal’s desktop client is barely good enough to check a box while Telegram’s desktop clients are as good or better than its mobile clients. Furthermore, its desktop clients are native and reasonably efficient.

This is huge to me. I spend a large portion of my day in front of computers, so messaging services that take the desktop seriously are much more likely to catch my attention.

Re:Telegram gets 3M new signups during Facebook apps’ outage by martin_a on Thursday March 14, 2019 @12:28PM (#19390787)
For me synchronization between desktop and mobile client is a big issue. Some messages simply don't appear on one device and vice versa. Don't know why, though.
Re:Telegram gets 3M new signups during Facebook apps’ outage by nicpottier on Thursday March 14, 2019 @10:08AM (#19389311)
No live location sharing as one. This is a killer feature for my friends and I.
Re:Telegram gets 3M new signups during Facebook apps’ outage by Frondo on Thursday March 14, 2019 @09:13AM (#19388886)
Having used Signal, Telegram, and Whatsapp heavily (friends on all three, natch), here's my one absolutely critical beef with Signal:

It doesn't always deliver messages, and it more frequently doesn't deliver them in a timely fashion.

In my experience, Signal delays delivery of messages about 5% of the time -- which is actually huge and makes it unusable for reliable chats.

The story which made me never trust Signal again: I was out of town and trying to coordinate with a backup pet sitter, because my original pet sitter became unavailable. I sent them a message via Signal (their preferred chat), heard nothing for a day, and started frantically calling around to everyone I knew who had a key to my place to please take care of a pet.

Several days later, I got a reply from them..."Hey, I just got this. Did you need me to take care of your pet?"

Over the course of several months of regular chatting with my then-significant otter, I also noticed once or twice in every two week period we'd have a half-day delay on messages...just...silence from one of us or the other, followed by, "Where were you? I texted you hours ago." from one or the other of us.

I know not everyone has these problems with Signal, but I've also seen enough other people on here alone complain about this that I know it's not just my hardware or network setup (this was across both Android and IOS devices).

For that alone, I will try to deflect away from Signal for anyone who's got any other chat methods set up.

Telegram, on the other hand, has been absolutely reliable, both in regular and secure chats. Never a lost message, never a delayed message.

Same for Whatsapp.

Signal also has the worst UI of all of them, and it comes down to all the polish that free software almost always lacks. On Signal on Android, you can select different colored themes (I like night mode for everything); on IOS, you're stuck with white. The chat bubbles are very plain on Signal, on Telegram they're a little fancier. You can set a chat background on Telegram; Signal, it's a plain white chat. Telegram? You can add sticker packs and use stickers in chats. No stickers in Signal. Attaching photos is cruder in Signal. Group chats are weirder in Signal.

If the visual flair doesn't matter to you, then fine, I get it, you don't need to tell me it's not important -- it's important to me.

And one more thing that isn't really 100% Signal's fault but absolutely drove me mad when I used it on Android as a replacement to the default SMS app: there's no real way to know when someone sets up Signal and then uninstalls it, and Signal defaults to sending secure messages every time. So, there were a few people I'd text who, I'd send them a text (which Signal sent over its own network), hear nothing for a few hours, then remember that they were one of the people who had uninstalled Signal, and I'd resend the message via non-encrypted SMS and receive an instant reply.

No way to tell Signal, "never send to these people via Signal, only use SMS with these people," which adds a tremendous friction to a chat app that really shouldn't be there. Not 100% Signal's fault (those people arguably should be "deregistering" from Signal) but absolutely within their ability to build a fix for it.

Re:Telegram gets 3M new signups during Facebook apps’ outage by patcon on Thursday March 14, 2019 @09:24AM (#19388963)
> Telegram, on the other hand, has been absolutely reliable, both in regular and secure chats. Never a lost message, never a delayed message.

> Same for Whatsapp.

what's disturbing to me (from a relatively naive perspective -- I'm familiar with terms like PSTN and MVNO and the general system, but I havn't worked in telecom): you've described what would be exactly how a nation state would kill a superior and more secure messaging app. Compel telcos to drop/delay GCM of websocket/GCM push notifications for a small minority of device IDs, so that the userbase rotted away...

Re:Telegram gets 3M new signups during Facebook apps’ outage by Frondo on Thursday March 14, 2019 @09:32AM (#19389033)
State actors have a much more direct route to killing secure chats like Telegram and Signal: they firewall the servers at the national level.

There've been several state actors that have done this to both Telegram and Signal already -- both of these apps employ different ways of avoiding it but this is already one of the arms races in the world of secure chats.

FWIW, my problems with Signal losing/delaying messages are all US-based, which AFAIK has never been accused of doing any sort of state-level firewalling of secure chat apps.

Re:Telegram gets 3M new signups during Facebook apps’ outage by unimpressive on Thursday March 14, 2019 @11:56AM (#19390407)
Yes but that's very obvious, the route just discussed is subtle and difficult to detect.
Re:Telegram gets 3M new signups during Facebook apps’ outage by Frondo on Thursday March 14, 2019 @12:37PM (#19390869)
I just don't think state actors need to go that far. They can shut it down more easily than slowly trying to sink it through attrition.

And besides, if I were a state actor and I wanted to sink a program like Signal through such subversive means, I'd probably have someone start contributing to the project, and then start arguing in favor of bad UX choices; make it harder to use, not just unreliable, in favor of "security". Push it out of the realm of what a normal user could conceivably make use of.

That's the kind of long con I'd play -- play on techies' love of doing things on principle and for theoretical purposes, and general disinterest in UX.

Re:Telegram gets 3M new signups during Facebook apps’ outage by 14 on Thursday March 14, 2019 @09:51AM (#19389186)
I really wish I could see this visual flare you are talking about as in if you could post some images I would buy it. I am honestly sitting here and thinking about what exactly flare might look like in a messaging app and I can’t really come up with an answer. Is it a color scheme? The layout of the buttons? Signal to me seems like many of the other messaging apps all much the same maybe slightly different in layout. I go to my messaging app to send a message. What is this flare you say is important to you? Genuine question here. Thanks
Re:Telegram gets 3M new signups during Facebook apps’ outage by Frondo on Thursday March 14, 2019 @10:23AM (#19389458)
Again, if visual flair isn't important to you, then fine, it isn't important to you. It's important to me -- I like my stuff to look subjectively "nice" and

Here's Signal:

https://imagebin.ca/v/4aAU1ai9CG8D

And Telegram:

https://imagebin.ca/v/4aAUJhRmj8Jx

Signal is white (and no night mode on IOS), the bubbles are undecorated rounded rectangles, there's no background and no option to set one, no stickers, no option to set disappearing messages on the fly, no indicator of when the person was last online. It looks plain.

Telegram has a night mode, options to set background colors, chat messages. It doesn't look plain.

As I've said, if you don't care whether something looks plain, then that is absolutely great and entirely up to you. Lots of people don't care about lots of things and there's really nothing wrong with that.

I like my apps to look nice (and I can, within broad strokes, define what "looks nice" is) and I know this isn't a unique position I occupy.

Re:Telegram gets 3M new signups during Facebook apps’ outage by zimpenfish on Thursday March 14, 2019 @11:50AM (#19390347)
> Signal is white (and no night mode on IOS)

In Settings, there's a moon in the top right which toggles light/dark modes. This is v2.37.1.0 but the release notes list dark mode as appearing in v2.30.2 which is about 4 months ago.

Re:Telegram gets 3M new signups during Facebook apps’ outage by 14 on Thursday March 14, 2019 @11:55AM (#19390398)
Thank you for taking the time to reply. That definitely helps show what you mean. I think for me the biggest issue lately has been I use a night mode and never really noticed signal is missing it though I only use signal with one contact but if I did use it more I think it would have come to my attention. I have always been a kind of minimalist with themes but in the examples you provided I definitely feel the one with trees is easier on my eyes. Thanks again.
Re:Telegram gets 3M new signups during Facebook apps’ outage by Frondo on Thursday March 14, 2019 @12:33PM (#19390842)
You're welcome, and I apologize for being a bit tetchy.

And you said it perfectly -- it's easier on the eyes, and I don't think it's one single thing, but several little touches.

Re:Telegram gets 3M new signups during Facebook apps’ outage by tuco86 on Thursday March 14, 2019 @09:40AM (#19389095)
I personally put most trust in signal. But i have had reliability issues with all of my (few) signal contacts.

Reliability trumps security for near 100% of usecases.

As a side note: We switched form slack to teams which has features no end but chat is't reliable as well.

Re:Telegram gets 3M new signups during Facebook apps’ outage by Fiahil on Thursday March 14, 2019 @09:58AM (#19389228)
> And one more thing that isn't really 100% Signal's fault but absolutely drove me mad when I used it on Android as a replacement to the default SMS app: there's no real way to know when someone sets up Signal and then uninstalls it, and Signal defaults to sending secure messages every time.

I'm using https://silence.im/ - A Signal fork - instead of Signal for this exact reason.

Re:Telegram gets 3M new signups during Facebook apps’ outage by glenneroo on Thursday March 14, 2019 @01:17PM (#19391306)
Weird, several friends and I have more or less this exact same issue with messages not being delivered for hours with WhatsApp, but never with Signal.

I agree with the SMS replacement for Android and uninstalling causing woes trying to send secure messages, have been bitten by that one on several occasions. Thankfully most people I talk to have multiple apps installed.

Re:Telegram gets 3M new signups during Facebook apps’ outage by jammygit on Thursday March 14, 2019 @11:31PM (#19396209)
I've had the same delayed send issue recently with signal. Its not a deal breaker for me, but I am open to other apps if they were comparably secure..
Re:Telegram gets 3M new signups during Facebook apps’ outage by cosarara on Thursday March 14, 2019 @07:22AM (#19388210)
Bad integration with contacts sounds pretty serious.
Re:Telegram gets 3M new signups during Facebook apps’ outage by roel_v on Thursday March 14, 2019 @07:43AM (#19388312)
Well yeah but it's not the mess the gp alludes to.
Re:Telegram gets 3M new signups during Facebook apps’ outage by kekebo on Thursday March 14, 2019 @07:56AM (#19388383)
plus Signal doesn't store all your contacts on their server as Telegram and WhatsApp do
Re:Telegram gets 3M new signups during Facebook apps’ outage by roel_v on Thursday March 14, 2019 @07:26PM (#19394946)
Do you mean that as a positive or a negative thing?

Also, apart from what I mentioned above, I've also found out that with Signal it's very hard to transfer your chat history to another phone. (involves manually copying over a backup, entering 30 char key). I can't in good conscience recommend an app like that as a replacement to anyone, so I guess my Signal experiment will be short-lived.