News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Give Me Back My Monolith by cortesoft on Wednesday March 13, 2019 @06:59PM (#19384838)
I really hate the term 'microservice', because it carries the implication that each service should be really small. In reality, I think the best approach is to choose good boundaries for your services, regardless of the size.

People forget the original 'microservice': the database. No one thinks about it as adding the complexity of other 'services' because the boundaries of the service are so well defined and functional.

Re:Give Me Back My Monolith by Rapzid on Wednesday March 13, 2019 @09:15PM (#19385659)
I really like this example. A lot of databases have very good module separation internally. However, you don't often see people splitting out query planning, storage, caching, and etc into separately hosted services forced to communicate over the network; even in modern distributed databases.
Re:Give Me Back My Monolith by mlthoughts2018 on Wednesday March 13, 2019 @10:59PM (#19386177)
Meanwhile, you also don’t see a lot of people claiming you should have one single repository that stores the source code, configs, CI tooling, deployment tooling, etc., for Postgres and Mathematica and the Linux kernel and the Unity engine, or that operating any one of these kinds of systems should have anything to do with running any other system apart from declared interfaces through which they might choose to optionally communicate or rely on each other as black box resources.