News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:On the Road to WebRTC 1.0, Including VP8 by nottorp on Tuesday March 12, 2019 @04:57PM (#19372943)
All I know about WebRTC is Chrome preventing sleep on my systems with "WebRTC has active peer connections". Made me ditch Chrome before it was fashionable to de-google.

So the only new feature i want from this WebRTC thingy is... an OFF button.

Re:On the Road to WebRTC 1.0, Including VP8 by om2 on Tuesday March 12, 2019 @06:17PM (#19373642)
In Safari, we have UI that always allows you to see which tabs are using a connection and stop them.
Re:On the Road to WebRTC 1.0, Including VP8 by nottorp on Tuesday March 12, 2019 @06:51PM (#19373896)
Safari never prevented my machines from sleeping ;) It's what I use now as my main browser.
Re:On the Road to WebRTC 1.0, Including VP8 by sempron64 on Tuesday March 12, 2019 @05:47PM (#19373390)
In addition to being annoying, WebRTC is a privacy hazard and I believe it should be off by default. I install this to make it so https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/happy-bonobo-...
Re:On the Road to WebRTC 1.0, Including VP8 by om2 on Tuesday March 12, 2019 @06:16PM (#19373637)
Fortunately, Safari's WebRTC won't silently leak your private IP address or other network info. We've also proposed a new protocol extension that enables peer-to-peer pure data connections in a privacy-aware way.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-...

Re:On the Road to WebRTC 1.0, Including VP8 by kitsunesoba on Tuesday March 12, 2019 @11:57PM (#19375594)
As a user, I really appreciate how the WebKit team approaches new features in such a measured and careful way. New shiny things to use are great but I’m more than willing to wait if it helps to prevent glaring oversights. There’s no benefit to rushing these things in.
Re:On the Road to WebRTC 1.0, Including VP8 by kmlx on Tuesday March 12, 2019 @06:15PM (#19373626)
isn’t webrtc by default off on all browsers? aren’t websites asking for permssion before the js is allowed access? and won’t it stay off when you deny the request?
Re:On the Road to WebRTC 1.0, Including VP8 by SahAssar on Tuesday March 12, 2019 @07:04PM (#19373977)
Nope, the audio/video capture requires permission, but the rest should work without a permission prompt.
Re:On the Road to WebRTC 1.0, Including VP8 by kmlx on Wednesday March 13, 2019 @11:15AM (#19379468)
"but the rest should work without a permission prompt"

what "rest" are you referring to?

Re:On the Road to WebRTC 1.0, Including VP8 by sempron64 on Wednesday March 13, 2019 @01:06PM (#19380845)
Connections can be made to other computers without explicit permission.
Re:On the Road to WebRTC 1.0, Including VP8 by kmlx on Wednesday March 13, 2019 @05:44PM (#19384193)
ah, i believe you are referring to the webrtc data channel. it leaks local IPs, but the severity depends on several factors, including whether you're running VPN and what you're using the VPN for, or just running behind a regular local network.

if you're running behind a regular local network then I wouldn't consider the local IP leakage as a "privacy hazard". local IPs are compromised already. everywhere. they are easy to guess. they are easy to obtain in native apps. etc.

there are issues when it comes to places where VPN access is crucial/vital. thankfully, very few VPN providers leak your IP nowadays, and with drafts such as what the poster above mentioned (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-...) this problem will be history soon enough.

Re:On the Road to WebRTC 1.0, Including VP8 by nottorp on Tuesday March 12, 2019 @06:50PM (#19373891)
No browser ever asked me if it can use it... and when I was using chrome, I looked for options to disable it and there were none.
Re:On the Road to WebRTC 1.0, Including VP8 by ptman on Wednesday March 13, 2019 @06:16AM (#19377298)