Re:Some airlines and regulators ground 737 Max in wake of Et...
by Svip on Tuesday March 12, 2019 @03:33AM
(#19366102)
That just makes it sound worse. Why should Norwegian get better support from Boeing than Comair? While I have no doubt that FAA or EASA would have reacted with more expediency had the crash occurred in their jurisdictions, it scares me to think that Boeing treats its customers differently, depending on whether they are Western or not.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Some airlines and regulators ground 737 Max in wake of Et...
by wholien on Tuesday March 12, 2019 @06:16AM
(#19366713)
the treatment is probably proportional to how many planes they order. Im sure if ANA or Singapore Airlines have some issue with their 787s, Boeing would respond immediately. Has nothing to do with western but everything to do with money.
See Lauda 004 for how Boeing treats a small Austrian airline. They only responded once the CEO (Niki Lauda) forced their hand by saying he would do a public stunt if they didn't respond.
Re:Some airlines and regulators ground 737 Max in wake of Et...
by salex89 on Tuesday March 12, 2019 @07:22AM
(#19367064)
Exactly. I didn't mean to imply that Boeing is discriminating based on the locality of an airline, but there is no denying that there is more money to be earned in places other than Indonesia or Ethiopia. That probably does reflect Boeing sells and airlines buy aircraft. This is just a strong hunch, I have no empirical evidence.
Don't get me wrong, I don't believe Airbus is a charity in any way and their sales are different.
Re:Some airlines and regulators ground 737 Max in wake of Et...
by ValentineC on Tuesday March 12, 2019 @04:24PM
(#19372614)
> Im sure if ANA or Singapore Airlines have some issue with their 787s, Boeing would respond immediately.
SilkAir, Singapore Airlines's regional subsidiary, is flying the 737 MAX 8 too.