Re:In Estonian parliamentary election, 44% of the votes were...
by darawk on Monday March 11, 2019 @02:30PM
(#19361467)
All of those things are possible now, yet they don't happen. I see no reason to think electronic voting would make it more likely. And in fact, we have a test case: Estonia. Is there any evidence of any of this happening there?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:In Estonian parliamentary election, 44% of the votes were...
by jakeogh on Monday March 11, 2019 @09:39PM
(#19364612)
By definition, electronic voting is easier to game. Simple example: you just asked for evidence on a procedure that didnt have a physical paper trail.
Re:In Estonian parliamentary election, 44% of the votes were...
by darawk on Tuesday March 12, 2019 @12:57PM
(#19370300)
I asked for evidence of a specific phenomenon. The specific phenomenon I requested evidence of would be no easier to have evidence for in the electronic or paper case.
Re:In Estonian parliamentary election, 44% of the votes were...
by jakeogh on Wednesday March 13, 2019 @02:44AM
(#19376283)
It takes much less energy and time to modify something electronically. Once physical items are required to be collected, edited or destroyed then evidence becomes significantly more durable.