News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nvidia to Acquire Mellanox for $6.9B by praneshp on Monday March 11, 2019 @11:48AM (#19359828)
> how come mobile apps and websites get valued

Can you name many apps and websites that closed (aka IPO or sold, not funding round) at 10+/20+ billion? Unless you're going to go for the stupid "uber is an android app my kid could could make for their senior project" shtick, I think most 10b+ apps are backed by _real_ technology

Re:Nvidia to Acquire Mellanox for $6.9B by tntn on Monday March 11, 2019 @12:22PM (#19360159)
Snapchat? (IPO valuation of 33 B)

(Not interested in playing the no true technology game, just pointing out that snapchat is the highly valued mobile app that comes to my mind)

Re:Nvidia to Acquire Mellanox for $6.9B by praneshp on Monday March 11, 2019 @02:08PM (#19361244)
sorry, I should have moved the end of my comment ("are backed by _real_ technology") to the end of my first statement.
Re:Nvidia to Acquire Mellanox for $6.9B by finkin1 on Monday March 11, 2019 @12:13PM (#19360061)
WhatsApp ~$22B acquisition by Facebook. LinkedIn ~$26B acquisition by Microsoft. Those are two that I can think of from memory.
Re:Nvidia to Acquire Mellanox for $6.9B by praneshp on Monday March 11, 2019 @02:04PM (#19361201)
Ah, I see. Not only do you have to have made solid technology, it should not be delivered through an app or website. I didn't realize those were the goalposts.

(https://engineering.linkedin.com/open-source as as starting point)

Re:Nvidia to Acquire Mellanox for $6.9B by finkin1 on Tuesday March 12, 2019 @01:43PM (#19370880)
I'm not agreeing with OP's assumption that there isn't any tech in apps or websites. I'm just giving you examples so that you can stop wasting your time with the least charitable interpretation of OP's point and actually respond to what he might have meant.
Re:Nvidia to Acquire Mellanox for $6.9B by godelmachine on Tuesday March 12, 2019 @04:00AM (#19366185)
LinkedIn - $23Bn.