Re:Peak California
by chrisco255 on Sunday March 10, 2019 @06:23PM
(#19355031)
Honestly, I have yet to see a non-compete at any tech company I've worked for. I think it's not common in the culture today. Tech workers are in high-demand, especially outside of the Bay Area. It might be more common in the financial world of NYC, not sure, but just working in enterprise SaaS software world, haven't seen it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
I have never not seen it. Non-compete and non-solicitation clauses are almost always non-negotiable and standard in employment contracts I have helped friends review, outside of CA. (Specifically TX, NY, WA, MA are the ones I’ve seen)
I have worked for or received offers from seven companies in Texas, New York, and Florida. Only one had such a clause, and that one was a small company that didn't really care about it.
I believe you. I’m just saying it’s not as uncommon as parent made it out to be.
> just working in enterprise SaaS software world
Microsoft, at least used to, aggressively enforce non-competes. I worked on an enterprise product at Microsoft in the 2000s and left to go work at Google, but I could not work on Drive/Docs etc
How was that enforceable? Unless you were working for Google outside of CA?
I was working in WA.
But have you seen aggressive assignment of invention clauses? California is pretty straightforward about "your time, your equipment, your invention".
One more condition normally, I think -- it shouldn't be relevant to your employer's business. That's a biggie, and makes it very dangerous to do any kind of programming in your own time if you work for a big company.