Re:SpaceX Crew Dragon Splashes Down After Historic Test Flight
by dingaling on Saturday March 09, 2019 @01:31AM
(#19344820)
> It really is a completely different paradigm
It has been done before; for example the Thor IRBM was a competitive bid between Douglas, Lockheed and NAA. Official specs specified the equipment to be carried but the bidders designed their own airframes and launch facilities.
Re:SpaceX Crew Dragon Splashes Down After Historic Test Flight
by simonh on Saturday March 09, 2019 @03:18AM
(#19345092)
From Wikipedia: The Rocketdyne division of North American Aviation was awarded the engine contract, AC Spark Plug the primary inertial guidance system, Bell Labs the backup radio guidance system, and General Electric the nose cone/reentry vehicle.
Douglas only won the contract to do the airframe and integration. It looks like a typical arrangement of the era. It’s not as if competitive bids have never been part of this process, they very often have. That’s not the point at all.
Re:SpaceX Crew Dragon Splashes Down After Historic Test Flight
by sandworm101 on Saturday March 09, 2019 @12:55PM
(#19347408)
Final specs on paper came from nasa, but only after much back and forth with industry. The fact that any engineer is paid by nasa or a private company is, as i stated, a simple legal distinction rather than a revolution.
In contrast every aspect of the Falcon rocket and Dragon capsule design was determined by SpaceX. NASA set the overall goals and safety criteria, but you can see from the differences between the Starliner and Dragon designs how much scope the manufacturers had. It really is a completely different paradigm.