Re:Flu Research Once Banned Because It Was Deemed Too Danger...
by mikeash on Friday March 08, 2019 @04:14PM
(#19342249)
That’s more deaths than guns and cars killed last year combined. And think about how much time and effort goes into reducing those.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Flu Research Once Banned Because It Was Deemed Too Danger...
by magduf on Friday March 08, 2019 @04:43PM
(#19342484)
I have to disagree about this one. Cars, sure: we try to engineer cars to protect people better in crashes, we invent devices to try to help avoid crashes (e.g., blind-spot warning systems), we try to make roads safer, etc. Guns, no. Some people do vote for politicians who might push for laws limiting guns, but in office they don't do much because there just isn't enough broad political will to do so, because the voters really don't want to do anything about the issue because roughly half the population doesn't want any kind of new limits on gun ownership at all.
Re:Flu Research Once Banned Because It Was Deemed Too Danger...
by mikeash on Friday March 08, 2019 @04:46PM
(#19342508)
A major function of law enforcement is preventing murders (and to a lesser extent suicides), which includes those performed with a gun. That’s a lot of time and effort spent.
Re:Flu Research Once Banned Because It Was Deemed Too Danger...
by everdev on Friday March 08, 2019 @08:10PM
(#19343805)
If by preventing you mean capturing killers after the fact and punishing them as a deterrent, yes.