Re:New York City considering legislation to ban cashless ret...
by mbostleman on Friday March 08, 2019 @10:12AM
(#19338153)
So there's an opportunity it sounds like. Why are no services stepping in to capture all those potential customers?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:New York City considering legislation to ban cashless ret...
by gerbilly on Friday March 08, 2019 @10:13AM
(#19338171)
Oh there are, all those cheque cashing places for example, and they're under-regulated, so not too great either.
Still paying a larger fee to cash a cheque sure beats having all your assets frozen entirely.
Re:New York City considering legislation to ban cashless ret...
by mbostleman on Friday March 08, 2019 @10:20AM
(#19338245)
Check cashing isn't banking though. I mean why aren't there banks that can be sustainable without overdraft fees? I get the idea of a fee if they cover a charge in which funds aren't available. But can't a debit card simply decline if no funds are available - hence the bank never covers an unfunded charge and thus never charges overdraft fees? Are there not other ways to monetize banking for low cash flow individuals?
Re:New York City considering legislation to ban cashless ret...
by drivingmenuts on Friday March 08, 2019 @11:18AM
(#19338909)
Banks don’t really exist to help people save money anymore. For the most part, they exist to extract fees from people who keep money there and from borrowers.
Re:New York City considering legislation to ban cashless ret...
by ryandrake on Friday March 08, 2019 @11:01AM
(#19338693)
In addition to overdraft fees, banks charge monthly fees if you don’t maintain a high balance or regularly make direct deposits. This is how they “monetize” poor people. In reality the result is that these people go unbanked and simply keep cash.