Re:Neuroactive potential of human gut microbiota in quality ...
by ryanianian on Wednesday March 06, 2019 @06:06PM
(#19323921)
(not a scientist but that doesn't seem plausible. water takes up equal space to diet soda and also provides no nutrition.)
Re:Neuroactive potential of human gut microbiota in quality ...
by Mirioron on Wednesday March 06, 2019 @07:19PM
(#19324426)
Ah, I should've written a more generic "takes the place of" instead of space. I meant to ask something along the lines of whether the artificial sweeteners of diet sugar might be confused for nutrition by the gut bacteria. Basically, I was picturing a situation where the gut bacteria might try to "eat" the artificial sweeteners, but then don't end up getting enough energy from it and can't do the things they need to do.
Re:Neuroactive potential of human gut microbiota in quality ...
by dkersten on Thursday March 07, 2019 @07:31AM
(#19327461)
Like how xylitol can kill mouth bacteria because they eat it instead of other sugars but can't metabolise it.
Re:Neuroactive potential of human gut microbiota in quality ...
by Mirioron on Thursday March 07, 2019 @10:41AM
(#19328881)
Yes! That's pretty much the mechanism I was thinking of.
Re:Neuroactive potential of human gut microbiota in quality ...
by chongli on Wednesday March 06, 2019 @06:09PM
(#19323946)
Couldn't you say the same thing about water?
Re:Neuroactive potential of human gut microbiota in quality ...
by Mirioron on Wednesday March 06, 2019 @07:22PM
(#19324444)
Good point. I worded it very poorly and your answer would definitely fit. I meant to ask whether the artificial sweeteners in diet soda were taking the place of nutrition for the gut bacteria, but don't end up giving the bacteria enough energy/resources to live on.
Edit: poor wording above. I meant to ask whether the artificial sweeteners could take the place of nutrition for the gut bacteria but not actually provide enough nutrition.