Re:As Uber Prepares to Go Public, Its Lead Lawyer Races to C...
by adharmad on Monday March 04, 2019 @10:31PM
(#19307880)
Going public, they can get better at respecting local laws and regulations, and still sacrifice their customers (and of course employees) at the altar of their shareholders. (At least that is what I read the Op is saying).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:As Uber Prepares to Go Public, Its Lead Lawyer Races to C...
by bunderbunder on Monday March 04, 2019 @10:48PM
(#19307936)
Uber already has a pretty strong track record of doing poorly by its emplo-- er, sorry, "independent contractors."
Re:As Uber Prepares to Go Public, Its Lead Lawyer Races to C...
by fosk on Monday March 04, 2019 @11:17PM
(#19308064)
I keep hearing this argument, but well guess what? Nobody is forcing anybody to become an Uber driver. If Uber treats their contractors so poorly, they are always free to go around and explore other options. We live in a capitalistic society, after all.
Re:As Uber Prepares to Go Public, Its Lead Lawyer Races to C...
by tyingq on Monday March 04, 2019 @11:27PM
(#19308108)
One argument is that it may not be actually legal to treat them as contractors. See https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/understanding-employee-vs-contr...
Re:As Uber Prepares to Go Public, Its Lead Lawyer Races to C...
by fosk on Monday March 04, 2019 @11:56PM
(#19308201)
The point I am making is that no driver would ever want to work for Uber if Uber really was that bad. Turns out, drivers evaluated the pros and cons, and decided that regardless of their current treatment it is still better to be an Uber driver rather than going to work for somebody else.
I will leave the matter of discussing the legality of how they treat their contractors to our courts. But it's a fact that thousands of drivers still think it's worth driving for Uber regardless of any legal controversy that may (or may not) exist.