The problem is that we already have regulations to avoid broadcasting on restricted/licensed bands.
In general, current regulation makes the owner of the equipment responsible for the broadcast.
This new regulation will just stifle development on SDR technologies
Re:Protest against the EU radio lockdown
by the_mitsuhiko on Sunday March 03, 2019 @12:07PM
(#19295461)
And the current regulations are impossible to enforce. If they would work we wouldn’t be in this situation.
Re:Protest against the EU radio lockdown
by gray_-_wolf on Sunday March 03, 2019 @12:37PM
(#19295635)
> If they would work we wouldn’t be in this situation.
What situation? What crisis is happening I'm completely missing?
Re:Protest against the EU radio lockdown
by Dylan16807 on Sunday March 03, 2019 @01:11PM
(#19295828)
> “Regulate” != “Ban”
Imagine how ridiculous it would be to have a regulation on wheels that they must try to prevent being installed on non-approved devices.
And in this case, the proposed regulation is:
“””[R]adio equipment [shall support] certain features in order to ensure that software can only be loaded into the radio equipment where the compliance of the combination of the radio equipment and software has been demonstrated.”””
Now I don’t think that’s a well written rule, but my problem is the specifics rather than the general idea. I think that either all broadcasts should be digitally signed, or it should not be possible for hackers to remotely modify many other people’s radios to broadcast false signals. (One-on-one modifications I don’t care about so much, but how do you write/pass such rules, given the difficulty getting people to care about or believe the scale difference between automated and manual hacking?)