News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bitbucket Pipes by SamuelAdams on Friday March 01, 2019 @08:27AM (#19280350)
Plus Atlassian is located in Australia [1], and the Australian government passed a bill that requires a backdoor to all software products [2]. So if you care about security, it makes more sense to self-host.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlassian

[2]:https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/06/world/australia/encryptio...

Re:Bitbucket Pipes by cyphar on Friday March 01, 2019 @09:01AM (#19280641)
> Australian government passed a bill that requires a backdoor to all software products

That's not quite accurate. There is now a legal mechanism that allows certain government agencies to force you to add a backdoor to your product. But until you are given a notice you don't need to do anything, and you can provide aggregated statistics to your users of how many requests you've been given. There are also some weasel-word caveats (the backdoor cannot be a "systemic vulnerability" but there has been much disagreement about whether this limitation actually means anything -- in my view it's basically meaningless within the context of a single company's product).

There is currently a review process open for the TOLA Act that closes in April[1], so any fellow Australians on HN should submit their comments -- there are only 65 submissions so far (and only 27 are by individuals).

[1]: https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joi...

Re:Bitbucket Pipes by jschumacher on Saturday March 02, 2019 @02:44AM (#19288124)
Another correction, Atlassian has offices in Australia, but predominantly hosts their cloud services in the US and Europe.