Re:AdNauseam – clicking ads so you don't have to
by ttty on Friday March 01, 2019 @06:10AM
(#19279511)
How do you put an ad trap? A selenium bot only clicks on what a user can see... I doubt you could notice the difference
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:AdNauseam – clicking ads so you don't have to
by mpeg on Friday March 01, 2019 @06:20AM
(#19279567)
This extension doesn't use selenium, plus that's not entirely true, selenium sees HTML and DOM while a user sees the final render; there's ways you can hide content from a user while showing it to Selenium-style bots.
Re:AdNauseam – clicking ads so you don't have to
by chii on Friday March 01, 2019 @08:54AM
(#19280585)
I thought selenium will throw an exception when an element being clicked is not actually visible.
Re:AdNauseam – clicking ads so you don't have to
by Someone on Friday March 01, 2019 @11:15AM
(#19282044)
If “ignore all clicks from a user that clicks >3 ads on a page” isn’t good enough for an ad network, it can add three or four ‘ads’ that technically are visible, but the same color as the page background. If a user clicks a few of them, ignore all clicks from that user on that page.
AdNauseam could detect that, too, but it gets exceedingly hard, slowing down the user’s browser. So, I think the ad network can win that battle.
Re:AdNauseam – clicking ads so you don't have to
by anoncake on Friday March 01, 2019 @06:25AM
(#19279588)
Does it? I don't think you can reliably identify whether something is visible if the other site, which controls the CSS, does not want you to. It's a classical arms race situation.
Re:AdNauseam – clicking ads so you don't have to
by plausibilities on Friday March 01, 2019 @02:21PM
(#19284356)
Re:AdNauseam – clicking ads so you don't have to
by anoncake on Friday March 01, 2019 @06:46PM
(#19286414)
<span style="opacity: 0.001">Trap!</span>
Re:AdNauseam – clicking ads so you don't have to
by thecatspaw on Friday March 01, 2019 @08:05AM
(#19280158)
Selenium can reliably do that, as it is a proper webbrowser controlled through an API