News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on SEC Asks Manhattan Federal Court to Hold Elon Musk in Contempt. Parent comment

Re:SEC Asks Manhattan Federal Court to Hold Elon Musk in Con... by sokoloff on Thursday February 28, 2019 @01:37PM (#19273789)
> It's more that the information is "material but not non-public", end of sentence.

Even there, I think that's covered by "Written Communications that contain, or reasonably could contain, information material to Tesla or its stockholders must, prior to posting or other publication, be submitted to Tesla’s General Counsel and Disclosure Counsel for pre‐approval."

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:SEC Asks Manhattan Federal Court to Hold Elon Musk in Con... by Dylan16807 on Thursday February 28, 2019 @02:18PM (#19274203)
That's the core of the argument.

Taking it literally might be the right interpretation. But it also fails to make sense in other ways. Is there an implied "not already public"? It's honestly hard to tell.

[ Parent | on HN ]