News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook wants up to 30% of fan subscriptions vs Patreon’... by yorwba on Thursday February 28, 2019 @05:50AM (#19270453)
That podcaster might be ordered to cease the blasphemy, and if they don't comply their website might be blocked, but I don't think that puts Liberapay at risk if they don't operate as a publishing platform but only handle payments. That woman didn't lose her bank account, did she?
Re:Facebook wants up to 30% of fan subscriptions vs Patreon’... by ck425 on Thursday February 28, 2019 @11:27AM (#19272502)
While many EU countries duo have blasphemy laws, they're almost never enforced. They're laws that the majority of people find ridiculous and would be quickly removed if anyone started to actually enforce them. If Liberapay did block someone for blasphemy without being legally compelled, they'd likely face a huge backlash themselves. If they were legally compelled the law would soon be changed.
Re:Facebook wants up to 30% of fan subscriptions vs Patreon’... by anth_anm on Thursday February 28, 2019 @03:12PM (#19274642)
It's not like the US doesn't have a bunch of laws that violate free speech but are never enforced, and thus still sit on the books unchallenged.
Re:Facebook wants up to 30% of fan subscriptions vs Patreon’... by rjtavares on Thursday February 28, 2019 @06:16AM (#19270555)
In any case, European countries don't have blasphemy laws (there might be exceptions to this - I know Ireland had it until recently).

That case the parent linked is about defamation (calling Muhammed a paedophile), not blasphemy (for example saying Muhammed was not a prophet).

EDIT: so I was wrong. See the comments below.

Re:Facebook wants up to 30% of fan subscriptions vs Patreon’... by leereeves on Thursday February 28, 2019 @07:19AM (#19270828)
The charge was blasphemy, or, in the words used in the article: "disparagement of religious precepts". It could not be defamation because there is plenty of evidence that Muhammad did marry and have sex with a child. That was not doubted even within the Muslim community until it became a source of controversy in modern times.

With Ireland's recent repeal, it seems there are now only 17 European countries with blasphemy laws, including Austria, where this case happened:

> Andorra, Austria, Cyprus, Finland, Germany, Greece, Italy, Liechtenstein, Poland, Portugal, the Russian Federation, San Marino, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom (Northern Ireland and Scotland) and the Vatican City. This list excluded countries like Belgium and Luxembourg, which provide narrower provisions for insulting the objects of a religion in places of worship or public ceremonies.

https://ipi.media/despite-danish-repeal-blasphemy-laws-still...

Re:Facebook wants up to 30% of fan subscriptions vs Patreon’... by rjtavares on Thursday February 28, 2019 @07:31AM (#19270881)
Well, it seems my understanding of the word blasphemy is not the commonly used: I was considering only "lack of reverence to a deity", while "insulting or showing contempt" to the practice is also considered blasphemy.

I stand corrected. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy_law

Re:Facebook wants up to 30% of fan subscriptions vs Patreon’... by yorwba on Thursday February 28, 2019 @07:15AM (#19270811)
Austria does have a blasphemy law. https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokument.wxe?ResultFunctionToken=a...

Specifically, it covers disparagement and mockery of religions and traditions if it is likely to cause justified anger. That leaves a lot open to interpretation (when is anger justified?) but it seems clearly aimed at blasphemy.