Re:Facebook wants up to 30% of fan subscriptions vs Patreon’...
by erikpukinskis on Thursday February 28, 2019 @03:08PM
(#19274605)
I seriously doubt Apple’s cost to administer the App Store is double digit percentages of revenue.
The 30% is a tithing to Apple for creating iPhone in the first place.
Patreon could sort of justify the same thing. Their real product is just the idea that anyone could be a monthly patron at all. That’s worth a LOT to creators. People didn’t think that way before Patreon.
Re:Facebook wants up to 30% of fan subscriptions vs Patreon’...
by kosievdmerwe on Thursday February 28, 2019 @05:04AM
(#19270264)
What content can you host on Patreon? I only really have experience with authors and text is cheap to host. Can you host video?
Re:Facebook wants up to 30% of fan subscriptions vs Patreon’...
by makomk on Thursday February 28, 2019 @06:01AM
(#19270496)
Nope, Patreon doesn't host video. Generally I think people upload their Patreon-exclusive videos to YouTube as unlisted and use that as a free hosting service.
Re:Facebook wants up to 30% of fan subscriptions vs Patreon’...
by corobo on Thursday February 28, 2019 @06:22AM
(#19270584)
Video no, but you can host audio. They have functionality that lets you set up a patron-exclusive podcast for example
Re:Facebook wants up to 30% of fan subscriptions vs Patreon’...
by duskwuff on Thursday February 28, 2019 @12:26PM
(#19273050)
Text and images. It's pretty basic, mostly meant as a way for project creators to provide updates on what they've been doing.
Re:Facebook wants up to 30% of fan subscriptions vs Patreon’...
by quadrangle on Thursday February 28, 2019 @12:51PM
(#19273321)
Patreon is actually largely a paywall-service. It's about collecting donations AND tying that to accessing paywalled stuff.
Patreon is not that. At its heart, it's primarily a service for collecting donations. There is some content hosting, but that's kind of a secondary feature.