Re:Facebook wants up to 30% of fan subscriptions vs Patreon’...
by leereeves on Thursday February 28, 2019 @07:48AM
(#19270963)
It states clearly that it's also "to allow us to operate Patreon, promote Patreon, ...".
So if your content would make a good ad for Patreon, you've given them permission to use it without compensating you.
Facebook, on the other hand, has numerous ways to benefit that don't proportionally benefit the creator, including from indirect revenue sources like advertising and data enrichment that don't flow back to the creator in any way. I suppose this is alright when you are just showing cat photos to your family, but it's quite different when you are basing your business on someone else's market-dominating platform with large negotiating leverage. And there are known cases where Facebook has been known to very liberally appropriate ideas from companies that are competitive with them (e.g., Snapchat).