News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Windows 10: New study shows Home edition users are baffle... by type0 on Wednesday February 27, 2019 @05:03PM (#19267370)
> You should never have hours worth of unsaved work open. NEVER.

How about running long compilations, video decoding, etc

Seems to me that Windows is unsuitable for real work.

Re:Windows 10: New study shows Home edition users are baffle... by TheOperator on Thursday February 28, 2019 @03:30AM (#19269908)
I too am a superior unix-like OS user. I had a long comment written up about how M$ sux and how dumb Windoze users had to constantly save their work. I lost it though because the power went out and I didn't save a copy.
Re:Windows 10: New study shows Home edition users are baffle... by muthdra on Thursday February 28, 2019 @07:32PM (#19276892)
Hello there, fellow FOSS GNU/Unix-like OS user. I'm sure you are right because you use the same software as me and I'm right. Anyway, Windows is not real, man. Why is Microsoft even trying any longer? I personally haven't seen a reboot or a graphical user interface in like 17 years.
Re:Windows 10: New study shows Home edition users are baffle... by batrat on Wednesday February 27, 2019 @05:33PM (#19267543)
> How about running long compilations, video decoding, etc

That has to run (and postpone updates) more than a week to force reboot it.

Re:Windows 10: New study shows Home edition users are baffle... by gamblor956 on Wednesday February 27, 2019 @05:30PM (#19267529)
Windows updates can be postponed and rescheduled. They don't just happen while you are using the computer--you have to affirmatively let them happen. (Though in some cases updates are mandatory when restarting or shutting down.)
Re:Windows 10: New study shows Home edition users are baffle... by slavik81 on Thursday February 28, 2019 @04:42AM (#19270173)
Windows has an awful habit of popping up countdown timers to reboots in the background behind your applications. I install updates at every opportunity, but it still rebooted on me without having given any visible warning while I was in the middle of an Overwatch match.
Re:Windows 10: New study shows Home edition users are baffle... by nobodyandproud on Thursday February 28, 2019 @07:50AM (#19270971)
Reported for gameplay sabotage. And abusive chat, for good measure.
Re:Windows 10: New study shows Home edition users are baffle... by derefr on Wednesday February 27, 2019 @05:36PM (#19267561)
That’s not “work” (input state); that’s cache (computed state.)

And you’d normally do those things, these days, on a LTSB (i.e. workstation) or Server machine, which doesn’t have those problems.

Windows 10 “Pro” is Windows for “professionals” in non-computer-related professions, that need Microsoft to be their IT admin. If you are your own sysadmin, then you should be running LTSB and, well, sysadminning it.

Re:Windows 10: New study shows Home edition users are baffle... by vbezhenar on Wednesday February 27, 2019 @05:48PM (#19267616)
Microsoft does not agree with you. LTSC is Windows for devices (ATM, Medical scanners, etc), not for users.

https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/Windows-IT-Pro-Blog/L...

Re:Windows 10: New study shows Home edition users are baffle... by smittywerben on Wednesday February 27, 2019 @06:25PM (#19267836)
The autoupdate group policy hasn’t changed since Windows XP and still exists in Windows Server 2016.

I shouldn’t have to buy 5 enterprise copies for ltsb to turn that shit back off.

Re:Windows 10: New study shows Home edition users are baffle... by sisu2019 on Wednesday February 27, 2019 @05:23PM (#19267490)
how about you do pending updates and set your work time? I think planning is still allowed for real work yes? This is why I don't believe that all these complaints come from super productive future steven spielberg level content producers because people like that wouldn't even need to think about planning around such an utter triviality.
Re:Windows 10: New study shows Home edition users are baffle... by mrpigeonpants on Wednesday February 27, 2019 @07:12PM (#19268045)
What if I'm about to go to a concert, running late and I need to print tickets last minute, and suddenly windows needs to spend 30 minutes updating, without giving me a choice? The fact that you can't stop it in the moment is infuriating. Also, you can't expect the user to manually configure system updates.
Re:Windows 10: New study shows Home edition users are baffle... by sisu2019 on Thursday February 28, 2019 @04:05AM (#19270050)
what if on your way to the concert your car breaks down because you kept putting of the required maintenance for months and months? This is exactly analog to your example. "Car users can't be expected to initiate an oil change at their convinience". Oh please.
Re:Windows 10: New study shows Home edition users are baffle... by anoncake on Friday March 01, 2019 @03:06AM (#19278720)
That is not a good analogy. When a car breaks down, it cannot continue working. If Windows forces an upgrade, it could continue working, but refuses to.
Re:Windows 10: New study shows Home edition users are baffle... by mrpigeonpants on Thursday February 28, 2019 @12:54PM (#19273353)
My computer wouldn't break down without updates. I previously had windows 7 for years and never updated. And had consecutive months of uptime. You don't get it.
Re:Windows 10: New study shows Home edition users are baffle... by muthdra on Thursday February 28, 2019 @07:48PM (#19276991)
People like you are the reason we have to make system updates mandatory. Can you imagine if someone important kept an out-of-date primitive OS from updating for years? We have to be able to patch bugs in software whether you care about them or not. We are in climate change denial levels of discussion here.
Re:Windows 10: New study shows Home edition users are baffle... by asdffdsa on Wednesday February 27, 2019 @06:36PM (#19267899)
quite tragic how the only thing holding back untold numbers of academy-award caliber filmmakers are configurable Windows updates
Re:Windows 10: New study shows Home edition users are baffle... by decebalus1 on Wednesday February 27, 2019 @05:37PM (#19267568)
> real work

Not a current Windows user but I used to work in a huge distributed system of Windows machines bringing in some hundreds of millions of revenue. Was that fake work? Seems condescending to both not know about automatically manage update settings and to bash 33.5% of the server market share.

Re:Windows 10: New study shows Home edition users are baffle... by sisu2019 on Wednesday February 27, 2019 @05:47PM (#19267615)
Ops statement about "real work" is so absurd I can't even grasp what state of mind would lead to it. Like the fraction of world GDP produced on windows must be in the double digits, right? Like you can't be so sheltered that you don't know that most all professionals outside of IT are using windows, right?