News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Pentagon to Retire USS Truman Early, Shrinking Carrier Fl... by vpribish on Wednesday February 27, 2019 @04:02PM (#19266901)
they are very useful outside of a full-on war with a major power.
Re:Pentagon to Retire USS Truman Early, Shrinking Carrier Fl... by smacktoward on Wednesday February 27, 2019 @04:26PM (#19267102)
Of course, in those scenarios a much smaller, less expensive carrier would be just as useful. The difference between a full-on supercarrier and something more modest, like the America-class assault ships (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/America-class_amphibious_assau...), is kind of moot when the OPFOR is a bunch of guys in Toyota trucks.

And a smaller carrier would allow the Navy to field more of them at the same cost, which would mean being able to "show the flag" in more places simultaneously without having to run a few ships ragged trying to cover them all at once.

Re:Pentagon to Retire USS Truman Early, Shrinking Carrier Fl... by ardy42 on Wednesday February 27, 2019 @11:22PM (#19268930)
> The difference between a full-on supercarrier and something more modest, like the America-class assault ships..., is kind of moot when the OPFOR is a bunch of guys in Toyota trucks.

I'm not so sure when the more modest carrier is only seems capable of fielding VTOL aircraft:

> The America-class amphibious assault ships...are designed to put ashore a Marine Expeditionary Unit using helicopters and MV-22B Osprey V/STOL transport aircraft, supported by AV-8B Harrier II or F-35 Lightning II V/STOL aircraft and various attack helicopters.