News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Cloudflare expands its government warrant canaries by rsync on Tuesday February 26, 2019 @01:35PM (#19257022)
"The question at hand here is whether the government can compel you to keep the canary in place after a search/siezure."

I personally (which is the only viewpoint that matters here) would consider falsely updating the canary to be acting in bad faith. I would consider it to be morally negative. I consider it to be of the same kind as the other examples I gave of acting in bad faith.

YMMV.

Re:Cloudflare expands its government warrant canaries by grecy on Tuesday February 26, 2019 @03:06PM (#19257868)
> falsely updating the canary to be acting in bad faith. I would consider it to be morally negative. I consider it to be of the same kind as the other examples I gave of acting in bad faith.

Except that in the case of the canary, there might be the very real threat of violence or jail time for you or your loved ones.

If it were me, I can see a world where I would do things I think are morally negative if it keeps me and my loves ones alive and out of jail, and I think many other people are the same.

Re:Cloudflare expands its government warrant canaries by ijpoijpoihpiuoh on Tuesday February 26, 2019 @04:53PM (#19258631)
> might be the very real threat of violence or jail time for you or your loved ones

I mean, hypothetically there could be. But in the real world, in some countries, you can be fairly sure that the rule of law will be followed.

Re:Cloudflare expands its government warrant canaries by pure-awesome on Wednesday February 27, 2019 @01:58AM (#19261444)
Just take a look at this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unethical_human_experimentatio...

And these are just the ones we know about, and the page only pertains to experimentation.

You have to give some consideration to what "legal" even means when you're dealing with a government.

Re:Cloudflare expands its government warrant canaries by ijpoijpoihpiuoh on Wednesday February 27, 2019 @11:47AM (#19264435)
The last instance on that page occurred in the early 1970s. I never claimed the past was free of bad events. I said, prospectively, that a person could be relatively sure the rule of law would be followed on the subject of warrant canaries, in some countries.
Re:Cloudflare expands its government warrant canaries by grecy on Wednesday February 27, 2019 @03:03AM (#19261724)
> But in the real world, in some countries, you can be fairly sure that the rule of law will be followed

I think it's fairly clear we're talking about the US, and in this case everything is a secret. We have no idea what will happen, or if anything has happened in the past.

Re:Cloudflare expands its government warrant canaries by ijpoijpoihpiuoh on Wednesday February 27, 2019 @11:49AM (#19264472)
Obviously I can't prove the nonexistence of secret proceedings where people have been made to lie to the public. This is ever the domain of conspiracy theorists, because you can never really prove that no such thing has happened, to say nothing of proving it won't. Proving non-existence in general is a nearly impossible problem in the real world. But I think it's unlikely. People can feel free to let their irrational fears dominate their behavior if they want.
Re:Cloudflare expands its government warrant canaries by jjeaff on Tuesday March 05, 2019 @01:42PM (#19312959)
Wow, so you are saying you will go to jail if given the choice between that and not updating your warrant canary? Brava, but talk is cheap.