News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Julia by coldtea on Saturday February 23, 2019 @12:23PM (#19234302)
>I do not have this mindset then. I prefer tools who are mindset oblivious. They are really useful!

Yet you picked a specialized tool "imagemagick" (made for working with images), and want to drive it by another specialized tool (the shell, made for file and process management).

Since you want "mindset oblivious" tools why not write everything from scratch, in C?

Re:Why Julia by enriquto on Saturday February 23, 2019 @12:30PM (#19234341)
> Since you want "mindset oblivious" tools why not write everything from scratch, in C?

Because imagemagick, julia and other specialized programs already provide the advanced algorithms that I need. Unfortunately, julia is not a good team player.

Re:Why Julia by krull10 on Saturday February 23, 2019 @02:14PM (#19234982)
The Julia tooling is not currently designed for repeatedly creating new REPL/interpreter instances to quickly solve one small problem.

What it excels at is rapidly solving the same problem many times within one REPL/interpreter (since after the first time the code will be compiled), or for longer computations where the overhead of the initial compilation does not matter.

It would be great if it could also get fast at the use case you are interested in, but this isn’t currently what it excels at.

Re:Why Julia by coldtea on Saturday February 23, 2019 @06:15PM (#19236022)
>Unfortunately, julia is not a good team player.

Or, you know, Julia is not specialized for your use case.