Re:Four new DNA letters double life’s alphabet
by jbay808 on Friday February 22, 2019 @10:23AM
(#19226057)
A lot of people consider this to be an interesting question. I don't really. I think the prior of it is exceptionally low both because it's a less simple hypothesis than humans, constructed similarly, having similarly structured internal representations of the world; and because it seems plausible that some well-designed art or optical illusions would reveal such a difference if it weren't trivial.
But more importantly, I think it's like arguing whether all computers are big-endian, or whether some computers stores
[R,G,B] values in memory as [G,B,R]. It's not actually mysterious.
But more importantly, I think it's like arguing whether all computers are big-endian, or whether some computers stores [R,G,B] values in memory as [G,B,R]. It's not actually mysterious.