I don't believe this is correct in meaningful sense. Do you have any examples?
China assembles many components, but that's not something that can't be moved to elsewhere. Vietnam is already replacing China.
Best way to deal with exported CO2 emissions is to put carbon tax on imports and not to try to control where they are manufactured.
Vietnam doesn't seem to be really that different from China in politics, environment or other respects. It is hard to see how moving things from China to Vietnam is an improvement.
Japan is still the biggest exporter of passive components.
It's an improvement in the way that multiple competitors are almost always an improvement. Say the world wants to pressure China to reduce CO2 emissions or release the Uighurs from internment camps, having another producer of certain critical goods weakens their negotiating position.
Also Vietnam is a lot more likely to be open to democratic reforms than China is in the foreseeable future.
>Nearly all passives
Also this is not true.
Maybe we should increase tariffs on Chinese components to promote production elsewhere.
It's not just China, btw, there are pig farms in the USA with open sewage pools. But, cheaper meat!
Granted if you really really want to reduce your personal emissions, stop using technology from post-1950, maybe buy some land...