Re:Google says Nest’s built-in mic not listed in specs was n...
by justtopost on Wednesday February 20, 2019 @09:11AM
(#19207898)
Exactly.
1. History of privacy violation? Check.
2. Increasing pace and scope of privacy violations? Check.
3. Financial incentive to continue and expand privacy violations? Check.
4. Lack of legal oversight deterring continuing and deeper privacy violations? In every single nation, check.
At this point the onus is firmly with Google / Alphabet to prove the ethics of their actions, because we already know their intent.
(Not a dig incidentally, just that at some point the pattern of behaviour must reach a point that swings Occam's Razor to malevolence being the most likely explanation)